Chapter 6 - Alignments - Revision history

Lacrossd2: /* 6.5 Legal Vs. Non-Legal */

2023-12-04T18:42:47Z

6.5 Legal Vs. Non-Legal

MelasiN: /* 6.5 Legal Vs. Non-Legal */ Text Edits

2021-04-30T14:31:22Z

6.5 Legal Vs. Non-Legal: Text Edits

MelasiN: /* 6.3 As-Constructed Alignment */ Text Edits

2021-04-30T14:30:08Z

6.3 As-Constructed Alignment: Text Edits

MelasiN: /* 6.1 Background */ Text Edits

2021-04-30T14:27:39Z

6.1 Background: Text Edits

Lacrossd1: /* 6.5 Legal Vs. Non-Legal */

2016-11-14T21:12:58Z

6.5 Legal Vs. Non-Legal

Lacrossd1: /* 6.5 Legal Vs. Non-Legal */

2016-11-14T21:11:45Z

6.5 Legal Vs. Non-Legal

Lacrossd1 at 10:43, 28 September 2016

2016-09-28T10:43:59Z

Lacrossd1 at 16:23, 14 June 2016

2016-06-14T16:23:30Z

Lacrossd1 at 15:26, 14 June 2016

2016-06-14T15:26:26Z

Lacrossd1 at 14:25, 5 November 2015

2015-11-05T14:25:57Z

@@ Line 51: / Line 51: @@
-As described above, there may be several "legal" alignments on any particular project from which different parcels have been purchased over time. Considerable research and survey work may be required. Retracement of a legal alignment restores and perpetuates the original location of the Right of Way for a particular portion of a route, from a particular time period, and a specific property acquisition.  Right of Way plans, conveyance, previous construction plans, existing monumentation including Public Land Survey System (PLSS) corners (see Property Section), and other recorded and physical evidence is used to determine the proper location of the legal alignment. It should be understood that the legal alignment and the physical location of the roadway may vary considerably. When performing legal alignment surveys, the relationship of the legal alignment and the physical centerline should be clearly defined. Generally if property is purchased, the Departmentâ€™s past policy has been to describe the conveyance from the construction alignment, potentially creating yet another "legal" alignment.
+As described above, there may be several "legal" alignments on any particular project from which different parcels have been purchased over time. Considerable research and survey work may be required. Retracement of a legal alignment restores and perpetuates the original location of the Right of Way for a particular portion of a route, from a particular time period, and a specific property acquisition.  Right of Way plans, conveyance, previous construction plans, existing monumentation including Public Land Survey System (PLSS) corners (see Property Section), and other recorded and physical evidence is used to determine the proper location of the legal alignment. It should be understood that the legal alignment and the physical location of the roadway may vary considerably. When performing legal alignment surveys, the relationship of the legal alignment and the physical centerline should be clearly defined. Generally if property is purchased, the Departments past policy has been to describe the conveyance from the construction alignment, potentially creating yet another "legal" alignment.
@@ Line 57: / Line 57: @@
-An alignment that is designated as '''â€˜non legalâ€™''' is used primarily to locate features for the purpose of design. It can be considered a line that provides direction and stationing for locating features, determining quantities, and staking out the project. A non-legal alignment is not intended to relate to the location of the Right-of Way and is not used for property acquisition
+An alignment that is designated as '''a non legal''' is used primarily to locate features for the purpose of design. It can be considered a line that provides direction and stationing for locating features, determining quantities, and staking out the project. A non-legal alignment is not intended to relate to the location of the Right-of Way and is not used for property acquisition
 {{top}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:31, 30 April 2021
Line 51:		Line 51:


−	As described above, there may be several ~~â€œlegalâ€~~ alignments on any particular project from which different parcels have been purchased over time. Considerable research and survey work may be required. Retracement of a legal alignment restores and perpetuates the original location of the Right of Way for a particular portion of a route, from a particular time period, and a specific property acquisition. Right of Way plans, conveyance, previous construction plans, existing monumentation including Public Land Survey System (PLSS) corners (see Property Section), and other recorded and physical evidence is used to determine the proper location of the legal alignment. It should be understood that the legal alignment and the physical location of the roadway may vary considerably. When performing legal alignment surveys, the relationship of the legal alignment and the physical centerline should be clearly defined. Generally if property is purchased, the Departmentâ€™s past policy has been to describe the conveyance from the construction alignment, potentially creating yet another ~~â€œlegalâ€~~ alignment.	+	As described above, there may be several "legal" alignments on any particular project from which different parcels have been purchased over time. Considerable research and survey work may be required. Retracement of a legal alignment restores and perpetuates the original location of the Right of Way for a particular portion of a route, from a particular time period, and a specific property acquisition. Right of Way plans, conveyance, previous construction plans, existing monumentation including Public Land Survey System (PLSS) corners (see Property Section), and other recorded and physical evidence is used to determine the proper location of the legal alignment. It should be understood that the legal alignment and the physical location of the roadway may vary considerably. When performing legal alignment surveys, the relationship of the legal alignment and the physical centerline should be clearly defined. Generally if property is purchased, the Departmentâ€™s past policy has been to describe the conveyance from the construction alignment, potentially creating yet another "legal" alignment.

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 ==[[#6.3 As-Constructed Alignment|6.3 As-Constructed Alignment]]==
-This is frequently referred to as a â€œbest fitâ€ alignment, which represents the current physical road location. These alignments are typically computed using survey points collected along the actual roadway centerline (crack, crown, paint stripe, curb split, etc.). The points are used to compute best fit tangents and curves using data processing algorithms designed for such purposes, hence the reference to â€best fitâ€. The curves and tangents are usually compared to record alignment data from old plans and adjusted to create an alignment that best approximates both the intended construction alignment ''and'' the actual location where the road was placed during construction (as-constructed).  Stationing is usually matched to existing plans. An as-constructed alignment is primarily used to give the designer a sense of where the actual roadway lies and to provide a baseline for survey and design.
+This is frequently referred to as a "best fit" alignment, which represents the current physical road location. These alignments are typically computed using survey points collected along the actual roadway centerline (crack, crown, paint stripe, curb split, etc.). The points are used to compute best fit tangents and curves using data processing algorithms designed for such purposes, hence the reference to "best fit". The curves and tangents are usually compared to record alignment data from old plans and adjusted to create an alignment that best approximates both the intended construction alignment ''and'' the actual location where the road was placed during construction (as-constructed).  Stationing is usually matched to existing plans. An as-constructed alignment is primarily used to give the designer a sense of where the actual roadway lies and to provide a baseline for survey and design.
-The physical center of the existing road is considered evidence but does not necessarily define the legal alignment, unless specifically called for in a conveyance. The rationale used to determine this alignment, as well as itâ€™s standing (legal, non-legal) should be clearly explained in the alignment section of the surveyorâ€™s report.
+The physical center of the existing road is considered evidence but does not necessarily define the legal alignment, unless specifically called for in a conveyance. The rationale used to determine this alignment, as well as it's standing (legal, non-legal) should be clearly explained in the alignment section of the surveyor's report.
-The term â€œas-constructedâ€ may also refer to a '''historic''' alignment location that is not related to the '''current''' physical centerline of a roadway. When retracing alignments that are referenced on older conveyances (with terms such as: â€œas now surveyed,â€ â€œas now established,â€ â€œas now surveyed and constructedâ€ etc.), a present day retracement involves the determination of the old road location '''at the time of conveyance''' (e.g. â€œ1932 as-constructed alignmentâ€) which often varies considerably from the present day physical centerline of the roadway. This often involves extensive consideration of historical evidence pertaining to the conveyance itself. This evidence may be in the form of field measurement, purchase agreements, marked final Right of Way plans, survey notes, etc.
+The term "as-constructed" may also refer to a '''historic''' alignment location that is not related to the '''current''' physical centerline of a roadway. When retracing alignments that are referenced on older conveyances (with terms such as: "as now surveyed," "as now established," "as now surveyed and constructed" etc.), a present day retracement involves the determination of the old road location '''at the time of conveyance''' (e.g. "1932 as-constructed alignment") which often varies considerably from the present day physical centerline of the roadway. This often involves extensive consideration of historical evidence pertaining to the conveyance itself. This evidence may be in the form of field measurement, purchase agreements, marked final Right of Way plans, survey notes, etc.
 {{top}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:27, 30 April 2021
Line 9:		Line 9:


−	Typically, there are three different types of data described as "Horizontal Alignments" that are used for MDOT design, any of which may or may not be considered a legal alignment. These three types of alignments are: [[#6.2_Survey_Alignment\|Survey]], [[#6.3_As-Constructed_Alignment\|As-Constructed]], and [[#6.4_Construction_Alignment\|Construction]]. Any or all of these three may have been used as a legal alignment in the past. When re-establishing legal alignments, it is the ~~surveyorâ€™s~~ responsibility to gather and evaluate all the evidence necessary to determine the original location of the pertinent alignments for the specific project area. Alignments must be discussed fully in the ~~Surveyorâ€™s~~ Report, see [[Chapter_4_-_Survey_-_Types#4.2_Alignment_.2F_Right_Of_Way_Survey\|Chapter 4.2 Alignment / Right Of Way Survey]] for additional information. All alignments must be referenced to the coordinate system of the project. The following definitions briefly describe in sections below:	+	Typically, there are three different types of data described as "Horizontal Alignments" that are used for MDOT design, any of which may or may not be considered a legal alignment. These three types of alignments are: [[#6.2_Survey_Alignment\|Survey]], [[#6.3_As-Constructed_Alignment\|As-Constructed]], and [[#6.4_Construction_Alignment\|Construction]]. Any or all of these three may have been used as a legal alignment in the past. When re-establishing legal alignments, it is the surveyor's responsibility to gather and evaluate all the evidence necessary to determine the original location of the pertinent alignments for the specific project area. Alignments must be discussed fully in the Surveyor's Report, see [[Chapter_4_-_Survey_-_Types#4.2_Alignment_.2F_Right_Of_Way_Survey\|Chapter 4.2 Alignment / Right Of Way Survey]] for additional information. All alignments must be referenced to the coordinate system of the project. The following definitions briefly describe in sections below:

@@ Line 55: / Line 55: @@
 In order to minimize the creation of multiple legal alignments and thereby the confusion and added cost of future surveys, future ROW acquisitions should be based on '''''previously established'' legal alignments whenever possible.''' It is left to the judgment of the Real Estate personnel to determine when it will be necessary to utilize the construction alignment for ROW acquisition descriptions. It is strongly recommended that the assistance of the project Professional Surveyor be employed for this determination.
 An alignment that is designated as '''â€˜non legalâ€™''' is used primarily to locate features for the purpose of design. It can be considered a line that provides direction and stationing for locating features, determining quantities, and staking out the project. A non-legal alignment is not intended to relate to the location of the Right-of Way and is not used for property acquisition
 {{top}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:11, 14 November 2016
Line 55:		Line 55:

	In order to minimize the creation of multiple legal alignments and thereby the confusion and added cost of future surveys, future ROW acquisitions should be based on '''''previously established'' legal alignments whenever possible.''' It is left to the judgment of the Real Estate personnel to determine when it will be necessary to utilize the construction alignment for ROW acquisition descriptions. It is strongly recommended that the assistance of the project Professional Surveyor be employed for this determination.		In order to minimize the creation of multiple legal alignments and thereby the confusion and added cost of future surveys, future ROW acquisitions should be based on '''''previously established'' legal alignments whenever possible.''' It is left to the judgment of the Real Estate personnel to determine when it will be necessary to utilize the construction alignment for ROW acquisition descriptions. It is strongly recommended that the assistance of the project Professional Surveyor be employed for this determination.
−	An alignment that is designated as â€˜non legalâ€™ is used primarily to locate features for the purpose of design. It can be considered a line that provides direction and stationing for locating features, determining quantities, and staking out the project. A non-legal alignment is not intended to relate to the location of the Right-of Way and is not used for property acquisition

		+	An alignment that is designated as '''â€˜non legalâ€™''' is used primarily to locate features for the purpose of design. It can be considered a line that provides direction and stationing for locating features, determining quantities, and staking out the project. A non-legal alignment is not intended to relate to the location of the Right-of Way and is not used for property acquisition

−	An alignment that is designated as '''â€˜non legalâ€™''' is used primarily to locate features for the purpose of design. It can be considered a line that provides direction and stationing for locating features, determining quantities, and staking out the project. A non-legal alignment is not intended to relate to the location of the Right-of Way and is not used for property acquisition.
	{{top}}		{{top}}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{SurveyAmbox}}
+{{SurveyManualNavbox|Chapter 5 - Research|Chapter 7 - Property}}
-{{SurveyManualNavbox|Chapter_5_-_Research|Chapter_7_-_Property}}
+The Michigan Department of Transportation defines a road alignment as a series of tangents and geometric curves incremented in 100 foot stations that defines the location and direction of the roadway or proposed roadway improvement.
-==[[#6.1 Background|6.1 Background]]==
+Most Michigan roadways were first laid out and created 75 to 100 years ago or more. Generally, since that time, several road improvement projects may have been conducted on these roads using various methods of establishing the route location and acquiring property.  Because of this, it is important to determine which alignment was used to acquire the original Rights-of-Way.  It is also important to identify and re-establish alignments used on the subsequent construction projects conducted since that time as they may impact the current project.  In some cases, multiple alignments along the same route over differing time periods have been used to purchase property. It is, therefore, important to carefully research and substantiate the previous alignments and supporting documents used to describe and acquire property for improvement projects conducted over a particular route. Field evidence in addition to record documents is key to this verification process and further assists in redefining the design and/or physical location of the roadway.
@@ Line 11: / Line 15: @@
 ==[[#6.2 Survey Alignment|6.2 Survey Alignment]]==
@@ Line 16: / Line 28: @@
 ==[[#6.3 As-Constructed Alignment|6.3 As-Constructed Alignment]]==
-{{top}}
+The physical center of the existing road is considered evidence but does not necessarily define the legal alignment, unless specifically called for in a conveyance. The rationale used to determine this alignment, as well as itâ€™s standing (legal, non-legal) should be clearly explained in the alignment section of the surveyorâ€™s report.
 {{top}}
-==[[#6.5 Legal Vs. Non-Legal|6.5 Legal Vs. Non-Legal]]==
+==[[#6.4 Construction Alignment|6.4 Construction Alignment]]==
 {{top}}
-==[[#6.6 MDOT Alignment Standard(Annotation)|6.6 MDOT Alignment Standard(Annotation)]]==
+==[[#6.5 Legal Vs. Non-Legal|6.5 Legal Vs. Non-Legal]]==
-{{top}}
+A '''legal alignment''' defines actual location of the Right of Way based on either a survey alignment, as-constructed alignment, and/or a construction alignment as referenced in property descriptions, conveyances, i.e. legal documents. It is considered a property controlling entity similar in standing to government section lines. Often, the description of this line is used as part of these descriptions.  A survey to re-establish the location of the legal alignment is absolutely necessary when the purchase of additional ROW is required. Re-establishing a legal alignment is considered a boundary determination since the existing Right of Way is defined by, and described from, the '''legal''' alignment.
-==[[#6.8 Alignment Requirements|6.8 Alignment Requirements]]==
+In order to minimize the creation of multiple legal alignments and thereby the confusion and added cost of future surveys, future ROW acquisitions should be based on '''''previously established'' legal alignments whenever possible.''' It is left to the judgment of the Real Estate personnel to determine when it will be necessary to utilize the construction alignment for ROW acquisition descriptions. It is strongly recommended that the assistance of the project Professional Surveyor be employed for this determination.
 {{top}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:23, 14 June 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{SurveyAmbox}}
		+
		+
	{{SurveyManualNavbox\|Chapter_5_-_Research\|Chapter_7_-_Property}}		{{SurveyManualNavbox\|Chapter_5_-_Research\|Chapter_7_-_Property}}

−	~~{{SurveyAmbox}}~~

	==[[#6.1 Background\|6.1 Background]]==		==[[#6.1 Background\|6.1 Background]]==

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:25, 5 November 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	{{~~Navbox Survey Manual~~\|Chapter_5_-_Research\|Chapter_7_-_Property}}	+	{{SurveyManualNavbox\|Chapter_5_-_Research\|Chapter_7_-_Property}}

	==[[#6.1 Background\|6.1 Background]]==		==[[#6.1 Background\|6.1 Background]]==